Not The Same Old Thing
I know this will disappoint Candy, but I’ve read every one of Linda Howard’s books. Every. Single. One. Loved ‘em too. Yes, I did. From Duncan’s Bride to After The Night, I couldn’t get enough. When she wrote about the MacKenzie family, I wanted the parents to produce more kids so I could read their stories and, as if we’re cosmically connected, she knew and manufactured an extra kid. In case you’re wondering how you do this as an author, well, you have your heroine in an early book find a kid on the side of the road, name him Chance - ’cause that’s a good romance hero name for when you have him grow up and put him in his own book - and have said family adopt him. To ensure a plentiful supply of future romance heroes should your publisher request more books, you have the family produce numerous testosterone-enhanced boys and one petite adorable girl. She, of course, gets her own romance and there’s a horse in it. The horse is not the hero, in case you’re wondering.
Bottom line: I’m thinking Linda and I are growing apart. I’d take responsibility for the chasm yawning between us but, honestly, I think it’s her. No, really, it’s her. First, she ventured deep into romantic suspense. Can’t blame her. There’s money and slightly more credibility in that. Since I like suspense, that was okay, even though I did miss the strong romance theme. Now we have her newest, Killing Time. The one line blurb on B&N from LIBRARY JOURNAL says:
After the theft of a time capsule supposedly sealed until 2085, various contributors start dying.
Hmmmm. So, we’ve somehow moved from alpha cowboys to time capsule murders…..? See why I think she’s the problem and not me? Sure, my tastes have changed over time but this seems to be a case of a writer, at core, changing what she writes and asking her audience to follow her. That’s fair. Howard should get to move on and ask us to come along. Julie Garwood, Tami Hoag, and Sandra Brown have all done the same thing rather successfully.
But, this is about me. I have money to spend and she wants it - that part is the same as always. She’s changed and I’ve changed. So, now what? Well, uhh, nothing. I’ll buy this book and the one after that. Only difference is I’ll whine about it and long for the old days. For Howard’s sake, I hope all of her readers take the same approach I do. Imagine moving on and having no one follow you.











May 27th, 2005 at 2:48 pm
Helen, I too love Linda Howard. She used to be an automatic buy for me. I loved Son of the Morning, and even though it’s a little dated, Sarah’s Child still gets me. However, her last few books haven’t moved me, until her recent paperback original, To Die For, which I loved. Although it’s romantic suspense, something about the first person narration, and Blair’s voice got to me.
May 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
Linda Howard?
I can in all honesty say I’d read Small Animal Clinical Nutrition before picking up another Linda Howard book.
I know, I know, HelenKay. You’re thisclose to banning my IP.
May 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I can honestly say I’d eat my entire Linda Howard book collection before reading anything called Small Animal Clinical Nutrition. I might even eat a small animal.
And, yeah, you are right on that edge of getting banned.
May 27th, 2005 at 7:00 pm
“I might even eat a small animal.”
Roast guinea pigs (cuy) are quite the delicacy in South America: http://www.macalester.edu/~klarson/Food.htm
May 27th, 2005 at 7:31 pm
The very charming guinea pig info above is included in the 500th comment to my damn blog, circa March 26th. In honor of that event, you get a one-time pass on the banning.
Out of morbid curiousity, however, I will follow your link and may then be forced to re-think the pass thing.