RWA - Wrap Up Thoughts

Some miscellaneous thoughts.  You know, those things that hit me while flying back across the country and waiting for American Airlines to find us an open gate to de-plane at Washington National (I refuse to call it Washington Regan so please don’t write and correct me):

  1. Editors and agents agreed that the market for new writers is better than ever.  Publishers are showing a willingness to take a chance and are looking for new authors to develop and grow.
  2. In a point that may contradict #1 to some extent, the agents I heard speak all said they get some ridiculous number of queries each week - ranging from the hundreds to one claim of over 1,000.  They further said they give a positive response - ask to see work - in about 1% of the cases.
  3. Kim Whalen, an agent with Trident, bucked the trend a little and said she did think authors of category romance needed agents.  She says she’s always able to squeeze more money out of Harlequin/Silhouette and that her company has a great relationship with H/S and have made some progress on the contracts.

My thoughts on the conference:  Before I sold, I went to RWA for inspiration, information and a kick in the pants.  See, by the early Spring each year, my determination sputtered.  Okay, it shut down completely.  Going to RWA in July would reignite the fire and get me working again.  I would go to the publishing spotlights to gather information and to hear authors and editors from the houses I was interested in speak.  Sure, I also played fangirl and collected free books, but those really weren’t my main reasons for being there.

This year was strange, a kind of in-between land where I’m not really published because my book hasn’t come out and I’m not really unpublished because I do have a book coming out.  I’m not a joiner or an extrovert so conference in general aren’t my thing.  This year I didn’t need the How To Write A Synopsis class.  I listened to editors and agents but felt a bit out of place everywhere I went.  My editor’s comment to me was:  you don’t need this stuff but next year you’ll be part of the literary signing.  True, but I wonder if I’ll feel more a part of the process next year.  I find it hard to imagine having a book sitting on the shelves provides that much security.

The result is that I’m not sure what my needs are for RWA right now.  The reality is the person who most helps with my writing is my cp and she isn’t a member, I didn’t find her through RWA and I doubt she’d ever join RWA.  I’ll remain a member because the organization fulfilled a need in the past.  I’m hoping it will in the future.  For others it would be a waste of time and money to attend or be a member.  For still others, the information and camaraderie is essential and worth the price of membership.  The question is where you fit in that scheme.  If I figure out my answer, I’ll let you know.

8 Responses to “RWA - Wrap Up Thoughts”

  1. mary beth Says:

    Thank you for this great National coverage!

  2. Megan Frampton Says:

    HelenKay:

    I am _exactly_ in your shoes: published, but the book isn’t out yet. And worse, it’s a trad Regency, so its print run is low. So I too am wondering about attending next year; I did this year, and got some valuable stuff out of it, but am unsure if it was all worth the money I spent. I guess the next six months or so will help me figure that out.

  3. Jordan Says:

    I’m right there with you too. Currently, I’m assessing my memberships to several different groups. The urge to wipe them all from my hard drive IS strong. I got very little out of the last RWA conference I attended. I’ll probably go next year, but if it’s the same as last year’s conference, then I’m done. I’m just not getting enough out of them to warrant attending or belowing to the organization anymore.

  4. Jordan Says:

    attending or BELONGING (shaking head)

  5. Michelle Says:

    Thank you very much for your in-depth posts on RWA National. I found them incredibly helpful.

    -Michelle

  6. HelenKay Says:

    You’re welcome. Happy to help! If you have specific questions, let me know.

    Megan & Jordan - If you figure out the “right” answer, let me know.

  7. Sasha Says:

    I did my best to not pay attention to politics. I attened 4 workshops. Found three of them helpfull…and had a blast meeting all my cyber friends. LOL

    I say all in all the best thing about the conference for ME, was meeting my cyber friends, meeting my agent, and my editor from Berkley.

    Not sure if that’s enough of a reason to support the organization. But it’s enough of a reason to keep a “wait and see what the new board does” attitude.

  8. Lynn Says:

    Thanks for the great reports! And, LOL, I loved your comment about Washington Nat’l. As someone who lived in the DC area for 10 years and remembers the name change when it happened, I’m glad to learn I’m not the only one who still thinks of it as Washington National. I moved away a long time ago, so thought maybe folks had gotten used to it by now. But, it’s always Washington National to me. :)

Leave a Reply