<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Readers Have Spoken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/</link>
	<description>SEXY, SASSY, SMART ROMANTIC FICTION</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sybil</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>sybil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>Why is it odd that the same books show up on the best and the worst?

I don't get people wondering about that.  The poll, is a just that a poll, of many different readers.  ssssooooooo it would be different tastes... 

Hell if we were to poll just the people on this blog we could come up with books that some loved and others hated.  I don't think it has anything to do with hype, reviews or word of mouth.  Just different people like different things.

Maybe I am wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it odd that the same books show up on the best and the worst?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get people wondering about that.  The poll, is a just that a poll, of many different readers.  ssssooooooo it would be different tastes&#8230; </p>
<p>Hell if we were to poll just the people on this blog we could come up with books that some loved and others hated.  I don&#8217;t think it has anything to do with hype, reviews or word of mouth.  Just different people like different things.</p>
<p>Maybe I am wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>CUASMS (anyone find that acronym suggestive besides me?)  was my least favorite Monroe book.  I also liked TRD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CUASMS (anyone find that acronym suggestive besides me?)  was my least favorite Monroe book.  I also liked TRD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>I need to finish Passion.  I haven't gotten to the breastfeeding sex that's at the end.  I think they'r still having sex behind the screen where I've stopped.  And the whole hitting my womb thing was getting old.  And I found the language and a few other elements to be rather inconsistent.  ANd this was just in less than the first half of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to finish Passion.  I haven&#8217;t gotten to the breastfeeding sex that&#8217;s at the end.  I think they&#8217;r still having sex behind the screen where I&#8217;ve stopped.  And the whole hitting my womb thing was getting old.  And I found the language and a few other elements to be rather inconsistent.  ANd this was just in less than the first half of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HelenKay</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>HelenKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>Breastfeeding sex... Now that's a visual image that's going to stick with me. What the hell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breastfeeding sex&#8230; Now that&#8217;s a visual image that&#8217;s going to stick with me. What the hell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>It's definitely Valdez' Passion and it's definitely a love it or hate it thing. I haven't read it but I'm waiting to see what she does in Patience that will top Passion's breastfeeding sex. 

The stupid title for the Cheryl Sterling one was the least of it's problems. Hmm, I might have to go vote now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely Valdez&#8217; Passion and it&#8217;s definitely a love it or hate it thing. I haven&#8217;t read it but I&#8217;m waiting to see what she does in Patience that will top Passion&#8217;s breastfeeding sex. </p>
<p>The stupid title for the Cheryl Sterling one was the least of it&#8217;s problems. Hmm, I might have to go vote now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Celeste Bradley's "rogue spy lord ton regency brotherhood, etc." series has gotten a lot of buzz. I suppose this is the latest entry.
I'm also betting that Passion is the one by Valdez. It seemed to be a love it or hate it thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celeste Bradley&#8217;s &#8220;rogue spy lord ton regency brotherhood, etc.&#8221; series has gotten a lot of buzz. I suppose this is the latest entry.<br />
I&#8217;m also betting that Passion is the one by Valdez. It seemed to be a love it or hate it thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn M</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>I've taken a look at the list, too, and have several titles from both the Best and Worst lists on my TBR pile. Problem for me is that I don't read enough that was published in 2005 to feel qualified to vote and therefore abstain.

But what I find most telling is how many titles show up on both the Best list and the Worst list. Clearly this is a case of hype leading people to expect something, only to be so disappointed that the book receives even lower opinions than it maybe deserves. If I've heard that some book is just the greatest, read it to find it only mediocre, then I would be tempted to say it was horrible because I'd expected something so wonderful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken a look at the list, too, and have several titles from both the Best and Worst lists on my TBR pile. Problem for me is that I don&#8217;t read enough that was published in 2005 to feel qualified to vote and therefore abstain.</p>
<p>But what I find most telling is how many titles show up on both the Best list and the Worst list. Clearly this is a case of hype leading people to expect something, only to be so disappointed that the book receives even lower opinions than it maybe deserves. If I&#8217;ve heard that some book is just the greatest, read it to find it only mediocre, then I would be tempted to say it was horrible because I&#8217;d expected something so wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy L</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Interesting list. Some of these, I believe, actually received good review at AAR. Also, I'm pretty sure that most of them got good word-of-mouth reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting list. Some of these, I believe, actually received good review at AAR. Also, I&#8217;m pretty sure that most of them got good word-of-mouth reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2006/02/the-readers-have-spoken/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=282#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>I've a feeling that it's Passion by Lisa Valdez. I'm reasonably sure it's the only book titled Passion that people have been talking about in the last year. 

Gibson's inconsistent, which may explain why that's on the list--I've not read that particular one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve a feeling that it&#8217;s Passion by Lisa Valdez. I&#8217;m reasonably sure it&#8217;s the only book titled Passion that people have been talking about in the last year. </p>
<p>Gibson&#8217;s inconsistent, which may explain why that&#8217;s on the list&#8211;I&#8217;ve not read that particular one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
