Comments on: Spotlight On Lauren Fox http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2008/05/spotlight-on-lauren-fox/ SEXY, SASSY, SMART ROMANTIC FICTION Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:00:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Stacy ~ http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2008/05/spotlight-on-lauren-fox/#comment-32585 Stacy ~ Wed, 14 May 2008 10:00:51 +0000 http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=1049#comment-32585 I do love my share of trainwrecks, though this one kinda has me wavering. Maybe I'l check it out for when I need a non-romance. I do love my share of trainwrecks, though this one kinda has me wavering. Maybe I’l check it out for when I need a non-romance.

]]> By: Cindy Procter-King http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/2008/05/spotlight-on-lauren-fox/#comment-32501 Cindy Procter-King Tue, 13 May 2008 19:16:50 +0000 http://helenkaydimon.com/blog/?p=1049#comment-32501 What was on the back cover that didn't appeal to you? I love the front cover. As to "smart women's fiction..." Is there a "stupid women's fiction" category, too, LOL? I've heard "upmarket women's fiction," but I don't really know what it means. It makes me feel like I need to earn a certain level of paycheque before I can read it. I've also heard "light women's fiction" as another way to get around "chick lit." It's, quite frankly, ridiculous. But that's the industry for you. ;) What was on the back cover that didn’t appeal to you? I love the front cover.

As to “smart women’s fiction…” Is there a “stupid women’s fiction” category, too, LOL?

I’ve heard “upmarket women’s fiction,” but I don’t really know what it means. It makes me feel like I need to earn a certain level of paycheque before I can read it. I’ve also heard “light women’s fiction” as another way to get around “chick lit.”

It’s, quite frankly, ridiculous. But that’s the industry for you. ;)

]]>